Kim Dotcom re-enacts the police raid and his arrest. Contributed by Nigel Marple

Why would the New Zealand government, at the urging of the United States government, conduct a raid on the home of an accused internet pirate with a force normally reserved for someone like, say, Osama bin Laden? Annie Goldson’s documentary “Kim Dotcom: Caught in the Web” compellingly suggests that the Motion Picture Association of America and its lobby have so much political pull that they can influence other countries’ governments to conduct illegal raids on citizens if said citizens might be disrupting their commercial enterprises.

Dotcom (born Kim Schmitz) is an infamous German hacker who made his name breaching security on the internet before anyone outside of his ilk even knew what that meant. Dotcom’s file sharing site could be used to pirate (or share, depending on your point of view) original entertainment content.

In Dotcom’s case, there is no definitive evidence that Hollywood saw an overall increase in revenue once was taken down; in fact, some reports suggest actually contributed to Hollywood’s bottom line despite some of its users choosing to engage in copyright infringement.

Reporter Greg Sandoval sums up the situation best: “You get in between America and its money and we’re going to have big problems.”

The documentary is essentially a courtroom drama as Dotcom battles the forces of multinational interests influencing the American and New Zealand governments. The third act delves into the troubling fact that Dotcom, his family and associates were under intense personal — and illegal — surveillance leading up to the raid, something for which the New Zealand government later apologized. “Kim Dotcom” is a frightening portrait of blatant disregard for law by law enforcement and the extraordinary reach of the surveillance network of some of the most powerful countries in the world.

“Kim Dotcom: Caught in the Web” screens again at 11:30 a.m. March 16 at Alamo South.