The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.

Web Search by YAHOO!

Austin360 blogs > Out & About > Archives > 2007 > March > 28

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Forging culture with ‘The Namesake’

Movies: An advance look at my review of “The Namesake,” which opens at the Arbor on Friday.

Usher: This must be about India.

Customer: Yes, it is.

Usher: I’ve never seen so many Indians in one place.

Customer: You must not live north …

Usher: Cedar Park, that’s about as north as you can get.

Customer: Every Saturday at Wells Branch — the theater that closed — they show Hindu … I mean Hindi movies, and the place was always packed.

The yearning for a mainstream crossover hit that appeals to American and South Asian audiences is more than just a movie producer’s daydream. From the evidence of the multifarious crowd at the preview screening of “The Namesake” this week, audiences ache for a movie that depicts the convergence of Indian, American and Asian American experiences.

This movie, performed in English, Bengali and Hindi, among other languages, will not fulfill those longings exactly, although it comes close.

namesake.jpg
The South Asians sitting next to me giggled along with the struggles of a middle-class Bengali couple as they adjusted to life in New York, surprised by the abundance of labor-saving devices but disappointed by the isolation from traditional social networks.

Later, the Americans behind me cracked up knowingly as the Indian couple’s two children, now in the suburbs, predictably adopted teen culture: slang, casual clothing, minor drugs, sexual freedom.

Both contingents joined in laughter and audible sympathy as the story took a sterner turn and the Gangulis faced heartaches, twists of fortune and devastating loss. Profound family guilt and longing for trappings of the Old World are not exclusive properties of earlier American immigrants.

For a good part of the movie, the burden of translating these trials into comedy and drama fall on the shoulders of two mature, sensitive and subtle actors: Irfan Khan, who plays a bookish professor with a thirst for world travel; and Tabu, a graceful Bollywood actor who manages to make even a phone call to her son a minor song-and-dance of revelatory movements and vocalizations.

The title character, Gogol Ganguli, is played by Kal Penn, a light comedian best known for “Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle” and “Van Wilder 2: The Rise of Taj.” Penn specializes in outrageously typical young Americans who happen to trace their ethnic heritages to Asian or Middle Eastern backgrounds.

Kal.jpg
As such, the audience immediately embraced him as the curly-haired, pot-smoking, negligibly rebellious high-school graduate who gives scant attention to his younger sister, lonely mother or subdued father, who explains, in the movie’s crucial scene, why the boy was named for Nikolai Gogol. (The reverential tone devoted to this Russian author will not likely motivate viewers to read his works, since his ideas are not clearly communicated in this movie.)

The audience subsequently tolerates Penn’s Gogol as he rises in the architecture profession, adopts the family of his blonde girlfriend and trims his hair for a more uptown lifestyle. The trick, for the movie’s makers, is enticing viewers into weeping along with Gogol as he faces cataclysm and shears off his hair completely (his follicles play a symbolic role, if you haven’t guessed).

If our response to Penn in mourning is not exactly, well, as we might react to the more formidable actor who shares his last name, his Gogol — and his hair — continue to evolve into more ambiguous adulthood. Gogol, like other Bengali characters in the movie, never fits into one culture or another completely, and they come to understand that’s part of the first or second generation immigrants’ bargain.

Director Mira Nair (“Monsoon Wedding,” “Vanity Fair”) trails behind the David Lean and Merchant/Ivory traditions of ravishing landscapes, dazzling displays of natural light and, especially in this case, multithread fabrics revealed in doting close-ups. The symbolism is light-handed, except in the case of bridges, which muscle onto the screen whether we are in Calcutta or New York.

A gentleness strokes the heart of “The Namesake.” The characters are exposed to emotional, not physical, jeopardy, nothing outside the almost universal human experience. This balminess pushes the audience along on warm waves of familiarity and strangeness but ultimately fails to sink deep into our consciousnesses.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Categories: By Michael Barnes

From ‘Dirt’ to ‘Riches’ and TNR

TV: Well, the season finale of FX’s “Dirt” fizzled.

Yes, the scenes in the Joshua Tree National Park took the photographer’s dementia to new extremes. And we were shocked to find that Lucy’s brother had stalked the gossip mag editor (he was trying to teach her a lesson because he loves her!).

C%2BA.jpg
Jennifer Aniston’s guest turn as Lucy’s rival editor and former bedmate proved breezy, almost pointless, including their tight-lipped kiss.

The O.J.-esque stabbing scenes in the final minutes came out of nowhere, as did Lucy’s last line, as she lay in a pool of blood: “Take the pictures. Then call 911.”

What continues to nag — and TV critic Diane Holloway spotted this early on — Courteney Cox’s character makes no sense. She’s tough and scrappy. Then she’s hurt and vulnerable. I know one impulse is supposed to flow from the other, but Cox’s acting just doesn’t make the necessary connections. (Still, I like her more here than in “Friends.”)

The show holds my interest, and I hope it returns next season, given improved writing and acting.

TV 2: Needing little improvement is “The Riches,” FX’s fresh comic drama about con artists who settle into normal, suburban lives of a deceased, well-off family. (“The Beverly Hillbillies” bumps into “Grifters.”)

20070312ho_Riches_450.jpg
Like other FX shows, it teeters on the edge of moral ambiguity. Every time we feel a twinge of sympathy or contempt for the Travellers’ victims, something twists our perspective. (The fired lawyer turns out to have manufactured his family of adoptees; the snooty private-school headmistress develops a soft spot for the family’s prodigy.)

Suffice it to say that Deep South-accented Minnie Driver and naturally charismatic Eddie Izzard rule as the household heads who drum up different skills while fooling the “buffers.”

Media: Now that the newly purchased, expanded, re-designed and less frequently issued version of The New Republic has hit the stands, it feels more like Atlantic Monthly or Harper’s, in terms of a solid few hours of reading. From what I’ve seen so far, TNR hasn’t lost its punch.

leftnavcover.jpg
Read especially Andrew Sullivan’s demolition of Denish D’Souza’s latest book, which urges a cultural alliance between American Christianist theoconservatives and Muslim fundamentalists.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Categories: By Michael Barnes

 

Copyright © Sat May 26 18:37:18 EDT 2012 All rights reserved. By using Austin360.com, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement. Please read it.
Contact Austin360.com | Privacy Policy | AdChoices