Home > The M.O.

Kansas City Chiefs fans fight for Priest Holmes’ record

The Kansas City Chiefs have a great history in the National Football League, and one that dates back to the old American Football League.

But currently they are a bad team. A very, very bad team.

I guess that is why their fans are more concerned about history than the current season. To wit, a group of Chiefs fans have started a petition asking Chiefs management to deactivate running back Larry Johnson before he breaks former Longhorn Priest Holmes’ all-time rushing record of 6,070 yards. Johnson currently has 5,996 yards.

“We are asking you, as fans of this team, this organization, and of the pride that this city has in the Chiefs, please deactivate Larry Johnson. Please do not let his name sit atop the all-time rushing leaders in Kansas City Chiefs history,” the petition says, according to ESPN.com. “He has never represented anything close to the values that we have for our Chiefs and it would be another dagger to the fans that continue to support this proud franchise.

Of course, as fans of the NFL probably realize, the concern of history is not necessarily trivial here.

Johnson has come under increased scrutiny of late, after he used his Twitter account to criticize his head coach and then followed that by using the social media device to deride a fan with a bigoted homosexual slur.

The petition continues, “We are asking you, as fans of this team, this organization, and of the pride that this city has in the Chiefs, please deactivate Larry Johnson. Please do not let his name sit atop the all-time rushing leaders in Kansas City Chiefs history. He has never represented anything close to the values that we have for our Chiefs and it would be another dagger to the fans that continue to support this proud franchise.”

The team suspended Johnson without pay through November 8, but according to ESPN.com, “On Monday, the team reached a settlement with Johnson, reducing the amount of pay he would lose in half, to $315,000.”

Whether the Chiefs bend to the pressure is yet to be seen, but I would imagine if we scrubbed the record books of all players who have acted ignorantly or disrespectfully (which Johnson most definitely did in this case), there would be a few less pages in those proverbial books.

While Johnson stews and the fans grumble, it looks like the person who may benefit the most from this unsettling situation is former NFL Offensive Player of the Year Holmes.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment Categories: Sports

Latest comments

I think this is a very good article except one small error. It was not Priest Holmes who acted ignorantly or disrespectfully it was Johnson. I have never been a Larry Johnson fan because I dont think he reflects the values of most of the fans of the KC

... read the full comment by George | Comment on Kansas City Chiefs fans fight for Priest Holmes' record Read Kansas City Chiefs fans fight for Priest Holmes' record

I grew up in KC and was, is and always will be a Chiefs fan. I am for terminating Larry Johnson for his lack of integrity in representing the Chiefs and KC. I think they should reinstate the Mac Lee Hill Award for the best rookie ea year. Priest Holmes

... read the full comment by Doug Smith | Comment on Kansas City Chiefs fans fight for Priest Holmes' record Read Kansas City Chiefs fans fight for Priest Holmes' record

See more recent comments

Capsule review: ‘The Messenger’

messenger440.jpg

One does not need to witness battles on the screen to understand the horrors of war, as evidenced by screenwriter Oren Moverman’s (“I’m Not There”) incredible directorial debut, “The Messenger.”

Will Montgomery (Ben Foster) has returned from the war in Iraq a decorated hero, but with multiple injuries, he must serve out the final three months of his tour. Relegated to the bleak and thankless work of casualty notification, Montgomery must visit families who have lost a loved one in the theater. His robotic commanding officer, Tony Stone (Woody Harrelson), explains to the disciplined soldier that his new job is about “character” and one that must be done “before you can understand it.”

Reeling from the loss of his girlfriend he left behind to go serve his country, and haunted by the vivid images of war, Montgomery’s sole companion is a pager that goes off at all hours to alert him to his latest assignment. Throughout the movie, its piercing beep acts as a sword of Damocles hanging over his head, an audible device that leaves the audience on the same edge as the soldier.

As Montgomery and Stone enter each residence to notify families of their tragic loss, the camera enters behind them, offering the soldiers’ perspective on this horrible journey of endurance and duty, as they gut-wrenchingly deliver news that will forever change the lives of the people they visit.

Montgomery battles to reconcile his humanity with the emotional detachment required of the job, a function that Stone has assimilated so deeply that he seems to have no connection with his fellow man. As the cold relationship between commanding officer and his charge softens, Stone begins to reevaluate his understanding of war, people and himself.

Montgomery finds a kindred spirit in the form of Olivia Pitterson (Samantha Morton), a grieving military widow and mother of one, who is trying to come to terms with the death of her husband, a man whose soul she felt had already been lost to the brutality of life at war.

The script, co-written by Alessandro Camon, offers a loose framework for a movie that features some amazing improvisational work by the actors. The movie unfolds slowly and organically, with lengthy scenes that allow the open wounds of its characters to breathe, as they attempt to repair themselves organically.

Harrelson and Foster are outstanding in roles that should garner both of them Academy Award nominations. The relationship between these two men both dealing with their service and sacrifice in different ways, shifts seamlessly from adversarial to fraternal. While its subject manner is dark and discomfiting at times, the movie has a warmth, robust humor, and eventually, a hopefulness that left me moved unlike any movie I have seen in years.

Moverman and his cast and crew have created a stirring masterpiece that allows the viewer to inhabit a world we almost never see, and reveals the endurance of the human spirit and our need to find solace, love and fellowship in our fellow man even when we feel most isolated.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Capsule review: ‘The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia’

wwwwf.jpg

Inspired by director Jacob Young’s cult documentary, “Dancing Outlaw,” a movie that featured the eccentric tap dancing Appalachian phenom, Jesco White, “Jackass” producers Johnny Knoxville, Jeff Tremaine and director Julien Nitzberg decided to follow the entire White clan for a year.

Notorious for their drinking, drugging, violence and illegal behavior, the White family of Boone, West Virginia is a petri dish of dysfunction and amoral behavior.

The documentary, “The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia,” opens on a shot of a muddy puddle behind a chain-link fence, an apt metaphor for a family rolling around in slop, trapped by its history and genetics.

Using an animated family tree, the audience is introduced to one bad seed after another. The cameras follow various family members on an apparently typical year in the life in which they battle the law, their addictions and each other.

I’m always a little leery of a documentary that appears to exploit its naïve and foolish characters, but the Whites are more than willing participants in this quasi-sociological excavation of their sins. And the filmmakers don’t exactly seem to be overtly judging their subjects, for whom it seems they have a bit of an affinity. Whether that makes it OK to laugh and guffaw, I am not certain.

At times the movie almost feels like a snuff film, but instead of watching someone get killed, the audience must endure the shock, perverse humor and brutality of a family that is slowly killing itself.

A few glimmers of hopefulness appear in the bond and commitment the family members have to one another and the act of one White mother to try and get clean in order to save herself and her baby. But generally it is a darkly comic and unsettling look into a family set to self-destruct.

In the midst of the madness, Jesco White attempts to philosophize about the fate of this family that is a product of its geography and history. His massive back tattoo, one that features the visages of both Elvis and Charles Manson, may best encapsulate their burden — For as evil as they seem to be, there is a certain charisma to this band of country outlaws.

As the credits roll, the audience can shake its collective head in awe and disgust at the display of grotesque humanity in this unrated version of “The Jerry Springer Show” and then move on with their safe, comfortable lives, but, sadly, for the Whites, there seems nothing left to do but ponder the losing battle they half-heartedly wage against their demons.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Trailer Treasure : Hat Creek Burger Co.

lhs-Hat-Creek-Burger-01(2).jpg

2209 Rio Grande St. 732-2025, hatcreekburgers.com. Hours: 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Sundays through Wednesdays; 11 a.m. to midnight Thursdays through Saturdays.

Traveling the country as a reserve guard for the University of Texas men’s basketball team, native Austinite and former Longhorn Drew Gressett had ample opportunity to search for the perfect burger.

But after graduating and splitting his time between Washington, D.C., and China working commercial real estate ventures, Gressett decided to stop looking and just make his own burger.

Thus was born the Hat Creek Burger Co. trailer.

Capitalizing on the public’s growing interest in responsible eating, Gressett takes pride in the fact that his all-natural Angus beef is raised humanely, fed a 100 percent vegetarian diet and can be traced to its ranch of origin.

Don’t let the beef’s heady pedigree fool you. Hat Creek’s Big Hat Burger ($4.99 with cheese, a hand-formed two-fifths of a pound) is a mouth-watering double, dripping with cheese and just the right amount of greasy goodness to evoke visions of the most rewarding of backyard barbecues. The juicy meat is topped with mustard, crisp lettuce, tomato and pickles. For the easily intimidated, the Little Hat Burger ($3.49 with cheese) offers the same delights in a single-patty package. For a more personalized burger, grilled onions and jalapeños can be added for free, with bacon and mushrooms carrying a small charge.

Salty, fresh hand-cut fries ($1.99) complement the burgers, which can be finished off with a sinfully thick, hand-dipped Blue Bell shake ($3.99).

Hat Creek, named in part as an homage to Larry McMurtry’s ‘Lonesome Dove,’ opened last October in a West Sixth Street parking lot behind the Star Bar, which closed in July. The good thing about trailers is they have wheels, allowing Gressett to relocate to a parking lot near UT earlier this month. With an array of picnic tables and college-friendly hours, Hat Creek’s new location gives discerning burger lovers an alternative to bloated fast-food rivals.

For those who dread the labyrinthine infrastructure of the campus area, fear not. Gressett is building off the success of his trailer operation and has opened a brick-and-mortar location at 5400 Burnet Road (in the old Arby’s building) that serves dine-in and drive-through customers.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment Categories: Food

Capsule review: ‘Tenure’

Navigating the politics of college bureaucracy can be a tricky path. After bouncing around small liberal arts colleges in the Northeast, Charlie Thurber (Luke Wilson) finds himself nearing the end of yet another academic rope. He’s been at small Grey College for three years and his time to get tenure seems to be now or never.

Adrift in loneliness and dealing with a father waging a battle to be removed from his early placement in a retirement home, nothing seems to be going right for Thurber. When he is not agonizing over the future of his career at Grey or his family, he spends most of his spare time suffering his eccentric Bigfoot-chasing colleague (David Koechner).

When a cute, young, seemingly qualified professor, Elaine Grasso (Gretchen Mol), arrives from Yale, offering a threat to Thurber’s position in the English department and his White Whale of tenure, he goes into overdrive to protect his turf, haphazardly and comically plotting to keep his academic aspirations alive.

Wilson is likeable as the put-upon but charming Thurber trying to hold his family and career together, and Koechner successfully tones down and humanizes his over-the-top shtick in his role of lovable but hair-brained sidekick (think a more mellow and slightly less paranoid version of Walter Sobchak), but the film is a little too restless. Many of the scenes feature clever bits of dialogue, but they aren’t given time to develop, leaving a somewhat forced feel to the narrative.

Rosemarie DeWitt (“Rachel Getting Married”) steals a couple of scenes as Thurber’s rented date, and BobGunton (“24”) brings seriousness and heart to the role of Charlie’s dad, William Thurber, although his parallel story line at times seems contrived.

With his entertaining and at times touching feature debut, writer-director Mike Million shows promise as a filmmaker who understands the humor and heartbreak inherent in the human condition, although his first effort feels slightly too familiar to consider him a refreshingly unique voice.

“Tenure” screens again Wednesday night at 7 at the Arbor.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Ron Jeremy in Austin

As evidenced by pictures distributed via Twitter last night, porn legend Ron Jeremy was at the Dirty Projectors show last night at Antone’s. (I wasn’t there, so there’s an outside chance it was Orlando Magic coach Stan Van Gundy.)

Outside of the band’s name including the word “dirty” in it, it seems an odd pairing — a porn icon and reality TV “star” attending a show by an art rock band from NYC?

Maybe he just wanted to hit up the legendary club, and the Projectors happened to be playing. Or maybe the young vixen with whom he was spotted is a fan of the band.

The pic below came from Chris Saad’s Twitter feed, Twitter.com/drumjam. I don’t think Jeremy has any relationships with movies playing at the Austin Film Festival, but I have a call out just in case.

For what it’s worth, Statesman writer Peter Mongillo, who reports Jeremy seemed to be bordering on sleep at the concert, says the show was amazing. Some folks on Twitter (jokingly) seem to think he is in town for Monospace. Anyone else know why he might be in town?

Update: According to a helpful commenter, and apparently confirmed by this interview with Zach Galifianakis, Jeremy has a cameo in the dark comedy “Little Fish, Strange Pond,” playing at the Austin Film Festival.

ronjeremy440.jpg

As far as I know, Van Gundy (below) was not there …

vangundy440.jpg

Permalink | Comments (5) | Post your comment

Capsule review: ‘Youth in Revolt’

youthinrevolt400.jpg

Michael Cera (“Juno,” “Superbad”) has seemingly become the one-valve Miles Davis of the acting world. He plays one note, and he plays the hell out of it. But even if the great Miles could only play one note, the tune would eventually become tiresome.

With his role in the new darkishly comic “Youth in Revolt,” many wondered if Cera would show a little more dexterity and range and break out of his twee cinematic mold. The answer is kind of.

Based on C.D. Payne’s 1993 novel, the film tells the story of young Nick Twisp, a bon vivant (at least in his mind), who prefers the works of Frank Sinatra and Federico Fellini to the immature predilections of his peers. But he does share one obsession undoubtedly similar to those of all adolescents — he wants to lose his virginity.

When his low-brow mother (Jean Smart) and her boyfriend (a woefully underused and unfortunately predictable Zach Galifianakis) head to a Christian RV park for a summer trip, young Twisp’s life takes a turn for the titillating when he meets Sheeni, an intellectual Lolita, played by Portia Doubleday in a sweet breakout leading role.

Determined to win the heart of the peaches and cream young temptress who is a lover of all things French, Twisp develops an alter-ego, Francois Dillinger, who dares the nervous sexual neophyte into a world of arson and bold adventure, promising to “rescue him from himself.”

Director Miguel Arteta spices the film with clever animation (best used in the psychedelic montage of a sex manual) and unexpected plot twist that provide a fresh twist on the well-trodden ground of the horny-boy-goes-on-adventure-to-get-sexed story.

As for Cera, his Twisp is a similar but slightly more confident version of his previous incarnations on the big screen, imbued here with a sense of righteousness not seen in his other work. But his snide, contemptuous, cigarette-smoking Francois is a side of the actor we have not seen. Cera’s deadpan delivery of the imagine Frenchman’s acid lines makes one hope that maybe the young star will eventually end up in a Neil LaBute or Todd Solondz film.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Capsule review: ‘American Cowslip’

amcowslip.jpg

I imagine co-writer/director Mark David had the best intentions to make a wildly absurd yet humanistic film with “American Cowslip.”

Unfortunately, he did not meet his aim. Instead, the movie comes across as an obnoxious aesthetic blend of “Pee Wee’s Playhouse” and Soundgarden’s “Black Hole Sun” music video weighted down with melodramatic themes about our desire to feel love and a connection with those around us.

Trapped inside his house and his addiction, heroin junkie Ethan Inglebrink (Ronnie Gene Blevins doing his best Chris Ellliott-as-Beetlejuice impersonation) surrounds himself with the old ladies of the neighborhood who act as naive enablers, letting him win at poker to help pay his rent and support his addiction. The grotesque cast of characters are shot up close and painted in clownish make-up that would make them feel surreal if they weren’t so obnoxiously overdone.

Next door, his neighbor and landlord, an angry septuagenarian holding on to lost football glory (an over-the-top and buffoonish one-note Rip Torn), threatens to evict him while constantly chastising him and challenging his manhood. And when he finally gets a moment of peace to indulge in his addiction, Inglebrink must deal with the worshiping of his born-again brother (Val Kilmer).

Outside of maintaining a constant state of heroin-induced bliss, Inglebrink has one other passion — tending to his garden, and specifically his American Cowslip, a flower he loves because of its potential for growth and beauty. It is a heavy-handed metaphor that is as difficult to swallow as the relationship Inglebrink struggles to form with the 17-year-old girl across the street. The conceit is that both feel alienated and alone in their small California town, but in each other have found a strange sort of soul mate to help shepherd them to a more fully realized life.

By the time the dramatic conclusion of the rolls around, one could care less about the fate of any of the characters.

There is a message in here somewhere about acceptance, self-love, fear and addiction, but it gets lost in a trite script and a visual aesthetic that annoys more than it transports.

“American Cowslip” screens again on Wednesday night at 9:15 at the Arbor.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

‘This could end badly, Ron.’

A large crowd gathered at the Paramount Theatre at 3:45 on Saturday afternoon to hear three titans of the business, Ron Howard (“Apollo 13,” “Parenthood,”), Mitchell Hurwtiz (“Arrested Development,” “The Golden Girls”) and Steve Zaillian (“Schindler’s List,” “All the King’s Men”), discus the “The Art of Storytelling.”

The panel was moderated by trailblazing producer Marcia Nasatir (“Ironweed,” “The Big Chill”). While Nasatir at times seemed to have a very loose format to her questioning, her wit, charm and specifically her back-and-forth with the hilarious and sarcastic Hurwitz made for a compelling, if scattered, discussion.

What follows are some of the highlights:


  • Hurwitz received a large ovation when he confirmed that, yes, there is going to be an “Arrested Development” movie and he will be directing. While he has been very tight lipped about what will be in the movie, Hurwitz relented to Nasatir, and said, that there would be a heavy jail presence and then made jokes about the inclusion of TARP money, a nod to the inability of a film to be as timely as television due to lag times in production and release.
  • Speaking to the fact that many of his movies are based on real events, Zaillian said the reasoning is two-fold: 1) He’s always been interested in telling those kind of stories; and 2) Writers often get pegged with certain types of storytelling, and he has never felt the need to break away from that. As for his influences with regard to telling stories based on true events, Zaillian cited the Italian neo-realism movement and his love for documentaries. He said he has never liked the idea of putting “based on true events” at the top of one of the movies, as he feels that conceit is a loophole which serves as an “excuse to not do it right.”
  • Howard on what makes a good script: “No matter what the genre, it has to be suspenseful.” He went on to say that most stories have to be about challenges and tests of character.
  • On the writing process, Hurwitz said the things that come easiest to him in writing are the things about which he is the most suspicious, as he thinks it should be hard to write. He also described writer’s block not as the inability to sit down and write, but the fear that what he writes won’t meet his idea of what a screenwriter should be.
  • On “Arrested Development” as a TV show versus a movie, Hurwitz said that he is excited to make the movie, because writing “A.D.” for only a 20-minute show is much more difficult because it restricts his ability to go into greater detail.
  • While he said that there was a good reason behind why scripts he wrote didn’t get made, Zaillian did confess that he has one idea for a movie that he has carried around with him for years. He said he likes the idea of having one movie in his pocket for the future. In his case, that movie is an adaptation of Geoffrey Wolff’s book “The Duke of Deception.” Unfortunately, he said, the movie would be a period piece, which he said is “a great way to kill a project,” and not just because of the cost to rent the cars, as Hurwitz humorously suggested.
  • On the writing process, Hurwitz gave an anecdote about listening to Timothy Geithner talking about trying to fix the economy. Geithner had said that even when they did not know exactly what they were doing or how to fix what was broken, the financial team just kept showing up to work their way through it. Hurwitz said this story correlates to his understanding of how writing works. You just keep showing up to work, and you write. Expanding on the idea of work as being a key to success, Hurwitz also told a story about two sets of children were given a math test. One group was a set of students who were told that they were very hard workers, while the other had been told that they were extremely smart. After the smart kids outperformed the other group on the first test, a second, much more difficult test was administered to the kids. On the second pass, the “smart” kids gave up before finishing the near-impossible test, while those who were told they were hard workers pressed on in an effort to solve the problems that were above their education level.
  • At film fest panels, you will often get an awkward “question” from an audience member, and it seems at these large panels with big stars in big venues, you are almost guaranteed one. This year’s most awkward fest moment probably goes to the young lady who called on herself (in her defense, the room is big and recognizing questioners from the stage is a difficult task), and, after thanking the three men for inspiring her, went on a long tangent about the role of Ron Howard and “Richie Cunningham” in her life. She admitted that as a child she always thought “Richie” was a real person, and that instead of seeing the people on her TV as actors playing characters, she felt as if she was getting a look into someone else’s actual living room. This delusion continued, she said, until she was about 12 years old. She then said that when Howard left “Happy Days,” it scarred her and left a wound in her childhood. At this point, with the audience hoping a question was imminent, Hurwitz (who had the audience and panelists rolling throughout) leaned forward, looked at Howard and said, “This could end badly, Ron.” Everyone laughed, but the woman continued her questioning and pleaded with Howard that he produce Dan Brown’s new novel, “The Lost Symbol,” to help heal the wounds from her childhood. Howard laughed, and while admitting that these things take time, magnanimously assured the woman that there were development discussions underway.
  • It all ended well when Hurwitz concluded with the sentiment that whatever writers do, they should make sure they enjoy it.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Panel highlights: ‘What Gets Producers Excited’

Although it was going head to head with a “Conversation with Ron Howard,” the panel “What Gets Producers Excited” had enough of a draw to fill the Maximilian Room at the Driskill Hotel on Saturday afternoon at 2 p.m. Listening to a 50-year veteran of the film and television world is nice and all, but producers are the ones who help get writers jobs, and this festival is packed with screenwriters looking for a break or a tip on how to get their work on the screen. Practicality, then, trumped entertainment in this instance.

The panel, moderated by Drew Yanno featured producers Jeff Graup (“Obsessed) and Dawn Wolfrom (“The Perfect Man”). Garret Basch, a V.P. at Steve Zaillian’s production company, was scheduled to be on the panel, but was not around when things commenced. He would eventually make a belated and humorous entrance about 15 minutes into the proceeding, and his charming wit helped provide some momentum to the talk.

What follows are some of the highlights of the discussion:


  • Wolfrom said that one of the most important elements of any writer’s pitch to her — besides the fact that it relate to her field of interest, specifically comedy - is a writer’s passion for the project and his ability to get her excited about the project. In order for successfully pitch the work, she needed to share the enthusiasm and sell that enthusiasm to the next person in the line of development. The writer is not the only one who hears “no,” the producers must battle the same doubts, so they need to feel excited about a script in order for it to get momentum.
  • Graup: “The world of studios is a world of followers.”
  • Wolfrom on producers only taking on projects they feel can succeed: “I kind of feel like we’ve got three shots with each of our friends (in the business).”
  • Just as Brasch entered the room, the talk turned to foreign distribution and pre-sales of a film. Pre-sales are the money that can be made by selling distribution rights to foreign markets. Graup said that foreign market money used to make up for 40% of revenues but is now responsible for 60%. He said that for this reason, studios and producers are well aware of making a film viable internationally. To wit, he said that anyone would be sorely mistaken if they didn’t think Tarantino casting a German actor to play one of the leads in “Inglourious Basterds” wasn’t partially a product of the fact that studios knew it would make the movie more appealing to German audiences.

    Brasch went on to explain how pre-sales are basically the way a studio sells raises the money to make a movie before it is made, by selling foreign distributors on a script, director, actor and budget. He disagreed with Graup somewhat in that he said he believes that pre-sales now account for only 10% of a film’s production budget, whereas it used to be in the neighborhood of 95%. While this part of the conversation may not have had much practical use to screenwriters looking to get their screenplays made, it was very instructive in the ways movies get made. Brasch explained how some firms sole purpose is to use a complex calculus to figure out how much money certain stars, depending on the genre of the film, the star’s status and past performance, can be expected to bring in internationally. As a humorous example, Brasch said that while American audiences and executives may not drool over Richard Gere or Kevin Costner, to foreign movie folks, they represent box office gold. A weird system, indeed. As it relates to the theme of the panel, then, I guess it could be said that foreign money gets producers excited - but less and less so in today’s economic climate.

  • Graup, speaking on chasing trends and trying to fit a square peg into a round hole: “Don’t try to do what is hot. Do what you do best … Write what you know … Write with passion … and stop trying to sell stuff. Studios are out of money.” Following up Graup’s sentiment, Brasch said, “Don’t think about whether it is going to sell or not. We’re interested in the things that won’t sell. That’s what we buy.” He named “Half-Nelson,” “District 9,” and “Little Miss Sunshine” as examples of these types of screenplays. I would imagine the words of the two men both scared some of the writers in the room and liberated them.
  • Although they admitted it was a harsh reality, all three said that they are rarely inclined to take on a massive majority of most of the scripts they read. They all said that they could tell within the first 10 pages, and often in the first page, if a script was good or not. They also picked up on an instructive theme from the weekend: Writers should pitch a script, but always have several other ideas in their back pocket. One good script or idea only has so much heat; it is important to have multiple ideas. And, as always, the key for writers is to keep writing.
  • Discussing query letters, Graup said it was of extreme importance for writers to be diligent and original. He said that writers should spend a month crafting an excellent query letter, as it is the first (and maybe only) opportunity to display their writing prowess and creativity. If you’re just going to sit down and fire off an email query that you spend 10 minutes writing, it’s probably best not to bother.
  • Brasch, sincerely with a slight bit of self-aware corniness, said the scripts he looks for are “dramas that will make you laugh and comedies that will make you cry.” So, there’s your answer, folks.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Panel highlights: Write What You Know: Comedy

Judging by the dozens of high school students in attendance (as part of the Young Filmmakers Program) at the “Write What You Know: Comedy” panel, there will be no shortage of comedy writers or YouTube videos anytime soon. The Stephen F. Austin ballroom was packed for the 1:45 p.m. panel Friday, with a strong representation of both young people and local Austin comedians and performers such as Kerri Lendo, Asaf Ronen and Jason Neulander.

The panel was moderated by writer/funnyman Owen Egerton and featured writer-director-actor-producers Mike Feig (“The Office,” “Nurse Jackie,” “Freak and Geeks”) and AFF panel virgin Mike White (“School of Rock,” “Freaks and Geeks”).

Egerton was as affable and prepared as any moderator you will see at an AFF panel, and what he lacked in concision he made up for with energy and earnestness. While the discussion did not have a laser focus on the writing process, it was informative and enjoyable thanks to Feig’s generosity and garrulous nature and White’s oddball humor and struggle to express himself.

What follows are a few of the highlights:

  • Feig on what interests him regarding characters and material: “Comedy comes from vulnerability … I like to concentrate on characters who don’t normally get served by Hollywood.”
  • White said he likes ambiguity and not pre-digested material, a move that allows audiences to have their own, unqiue reactions. Feig follwed by saying that he and Mike, “both like making audiences uncomfortable … that is where the comedy comes from.”
  • White humorously admitted that he gets very emotionally involved in his writing, which generally precludes him from writing in public. The visceral reaction is such that when he is writing about a character crying, he will cry while he is typing. It definitely painted an intriguing picture.
  • Feig said that anyone who wanted to be a screenwriter or director should take acting and improv lessons to learn the rhythms of the way other people speak and to better understand what actors are going through when they work with them. He said the role of a director is to provide a safe place for actors to work, and that writers and directors should therefore not force an actor to deliver a line the way they would want them to necessarily.
  • “The scariest thing about comedy is you have to trust the people you’re collaborating with,” Feig said.
  • Regarding his writing style, White said that “overpreparing before (he writes) is probably the key to getting a lot if stuff I’ve written made.” Discussing his outlining and planning before writing, White said that you have to have an understanding of where you are going and the route that will take you there, as trying to improvise a script can be a very perilous and unproductive method of screenwriting.
  • Regarding work he wished got more attention versus fan favorites, White said, “You want the unloved babies to be loved, and the loved ones don’t need any more love.”
  • As for his golden rule of writing, Feig says he follows the words of George Bernard Shaw, “All men mean well.” By this he said he meant that if you can understand why a character is doing or saying something — no matter how bizarre or heinous — then you are free to develop a fully realized character that won’t feel like a caricature.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Panel highlights: Breaking Into the Business

If there was a perfect, fail-proof way to break into the film and television industry, this panel would have to be held in the Erwin Center. As there is not, the panel was held in the Driskill Ballroom to a respectable crowd (given the early start on the conference’s opening day) of about 50 folks, who listened to industry vets rep Bryan Brucks, local Pat Hazell and Dan Petrie Jr. engage with moderator Aadip Desai in a humorous and insightful conversation that likely gave hope to many burgeoning writers in the room.

What follows are some of the highlights:

  • Unlike years ago when one had to find film stock and a way to process it, Petrie spoke to the fact that there is now a huge democratization of making and showcasing films. But, as in the past, there is “always a hunger for new material.” There are people whose job it is to go out and find those new voices, but writers can’t be satisfied with themselves if they have one good script. “A great spec script is the premier ticket into the business … that is the most direct way. But you have to be willing to try several times. It’s not enough to have a good script,” he said. “It has to be a great script.” Petrie also made it clear that patting one’s self on the back for writing something that is better than half of the stuff out there in Hollywood is not a very remarkable accomplishment. This got a good laugh.
  • “You have to have one thing that people want and will look for,” Brucks said about agents and producers looking for “the next big thing.” He went on to say that he signed a guy two years ago off of a three-minute short. But once you are discovered, Brucks said, “You have to have your next idea” ready. It doesn’t have to be an entire script, but a writer should at least have a page or two of his next idea or his next two ideas. And beyond having good ideas, a writer must be “good in the room.” Writing good material is one challenge, getting into a room and selling your ideas to people is an equally important step in getting something picked up.
  • All the men made it clear that doing one great thing is not enough in an industry that is always looking for people’s next project. “You have to break in constantly,” Petrie said, which Hazell reinforced by saying that “heat on one project only lasts a certain amount of time.”
  • One of the most important points Petrie hammered was that you don’t want to be in a position of asking people if they will read your script; a writer wants people to be asking if they can read his script. A good way to generate that interest, Hazell said, is by creating a showcase of your work that can serve as a calling card, whether that be a short film, or in his case a three-man play that he produced at a small theater in Hollywood that drove interest of executives.
  • Brucks stated that chasing trends is a fool’s errand. With trends shifting so fast, it is impossible to keep up with them. In a prescient comment, he went on to suggest it is pointless for a writer to try and create the next “Paranormal Activity.” If studios wanted something in that vein, it would be more likely they would just go to the people who wrote that movie instead of hiring a new face to produce a derivative. In the case of a stinker, the executives could then say, ‘Hey, we went with a proven winner. How was I to know?’ But if they hire someone to make a knock-off of a successful picture, the executive would take the heat if it failed.
  • For those who feel there is no way to get noticed, Brucks was insistent. “Believe me, if you have a great script, someone will find it,” he said. Speaking to that, Petrie said, “It’s a tremendous feather in people’s caps to discover good material.” Brucks confirmed that often that is how people get promoted at studios. To wit, a guy in the mailroom discovered “Paranormal Activity,” and there is little doubt he is no longer shuffling mail.
  • There is no certainty in getting a gig, but pretty much everyone is going to face rejection. That’s just the nature of the beast. The key is to get used to rejection and don’t take it personally, Brucks said. And if you are lucky enough to get a job writing in Hollywood, get used to notes and get used to the fact that you are going to get re-written. It happens to everyone, and how you respond to both of those inevitabilities will go a long way in shaping the relationships you make in the business.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Writer and star of ‘Herpes Boy,’ Byron Lane prepares for his close-up

herpesboy440.jpg

Growing up outside of New Orleans, Byron Lane always dreamed of becoming a writer and actor.

But with a mechanic father and a mother who worked in insurance sales, the bright lights of New York and Hollywood seemed unattainable.

Instead, Lane made the pragmatic decision to study journalism at Loyola University, settling for telling the stories of others instead of his own.

After a stint as a news reporter and anchor at a television station in Alexandria, La., Lane’s career took him to the deserts of Las Vegas. It was there that Lane began to change course.

“Things were getting a little odd out there, with the news quoting TMZ and things like that. The opportunity came up to get in some acting classes, and I started on that route and loved it,” Lane said this week by phone from Los Angeles.

What happened next is a creation myth that has been told time and again in Hollywood, but that makes it no less true in this case. In 2005, bitten by the proverbial acting bug, Lane packed up all of his belongings in a car and drove out to Los Angeles, where he had a few good friends.

Because of his work history, Lane had the ability to find something many Hollywood aspirants do not — a steady job. Working the night shift as a news writer for the CBS affiliate in Los Angeles, Lane had his days free to write and pursue acting gigs. He quickly realized that the life of an auditioning actor in a city littered with broken dreams is one rife with rejection. But after watching the Web series “LonelyGIrl_15,” Lane decided to take his career into his own hands.

“I just thought to myself, ‘You know, I can do that,’” Lane said about his experience with ‘LonelyGirl_15.’ “So I decided to just create my own character. And in the middle deciding what to do, I was at Starbucks and the barista had a big birthmark around her eye. And I thought, ‘That would be perfect.’ Because I did want to do a character who was unique, and I didn’t want to just do an interesting hair style or just do glasses, so I thought the birthmark was totally cool. Then I just thought about where I was going to put it. So I put it on the mouth and called it ‘Herpes Boy’.”

Lane developed a Web series around the titular character, a young man who spoke directly to the camera complaining about the trials and tribulations of his daily life, from the hassles of going to the coffee shop to the nuisance of his mother’s manic dog. “It’s just little everyday things about life from the perspective of a person who is just exhausted with it all,” Lane said.

After receiving modest traffic to his Webisodes, boosted by some serendipitous timing on Funnyordie.com, Lane received a phone call that he could hardly believe. Producer John Baumgartner had seen the videos and was taken by the writing and performance. He met with the nascent writer-actor and asked if Lane could develop a feature script.

Lane spent four months writing his first feature screenplay. Expanding on the life of the character from his short Web series, Rudolph, “Herpes Boy” tells about a young man coming to terms with his own fears and insecurities while working to love and accept the eccentric and aggravating members of his family. While the script is hilarious, “Herpes Boy,” — a movie filled with rich and absurd, yet realistic performances — does not aim solely for the easy punchline as many recent comedies. It has a subtlety and heart that reveals the complexity of its creator.

“I’m not sure I would be that good at writing something that is just laughs,” Lane said. “I enjoy movies that have heart. The funniest comedies for me are the ones that aren’t just slapstick; they’re based in reality. Sometimes life is so weird and horrible that it is just hilarious.”

Baumgartner liked what he read and showed it to his friend, character actor Beth Grant (“Extract,” “No Country for Old Men”), who also felt an immediate affinity for the quirky movie.

From there, things seem to snowball. Lane contacted director Nathaniel Atcheson, with whom he had previously worked on a short film, who agreed to direct the project and bring on a producer and cinematographer. What resulted was what Lane likes to call an “indie film miracle.”

While he prepares for the world premiere of a movie that will undoubtedly put him on the indie film map, the days of sitting at home and dreaming of emulating his heroes Lily Tomlin and Woody Allen seem like a lifetime away to the Louisiana native. “It’s surreal. I literally can’t believe it,” Lane said.

Herpes Boy” makes its world premiere at the Austin Film Festival Saturday at 7:30 p.m. at the Alamo Ritz. It also screens Tuesday, October 27 at 7:30 p.m. at The Independent at 501.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

My written-in-pencil schedule for Austin Film Festival

Not that my inbox has been overflowing with requests to find out what I will be up to during the Austin Film Festival, but I thought I’d go ahead and share my intended schedule for the Austin Film Festival. Maybe it will help you sort through all of the screenings and panels, maybe it will give you a great opportunity to stalk me or give you a blueprint for avoiding me. Whatever. (Note: All descriptions of panels and movies comes directly from the Austin Film Festival Web site.)

THURSDAY 10/22

Panel: Breaking Into the Business @ 1pm

While seeing your work produced is the ultimate goal, selling the script is a great first step. Many scripts are bought and never produced. But your script can serve as a sample to secure other work. Much of a professional screenwriters’ income lies in script doctoring and assignments, not movies produced from their spec scripts.

Movie: “Youth in Revolt” @ 10pm

“Youth in Revolt” is a coming-of-age comedy that puts a fresh and outrageous stamp on a tale of adolescent obsession and rebellion. Starring Michael Cera (also of the Oscar winning film, Juno, and Superbad) and based on the acclaimed novel by C.D. Payne, Youth in Revolt is the story of Nick Twisp - a unique, but affable teen with a taste for the finer things in life like Sinatra and Fellini - who falls hopelessly in love with the beautiful, free-spirited Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday) while on a family vacation. But family, geography and jealous ex-lovers conspire to keep these two apart. With Sheeni’s encouragement, Nick abandons his dull, predictable life and develops a rebellious alter ego: Francois. With his ascot, his moustache and his cigarette, Francois will stop at nothing to be with Sheeni, and leads Nick Twisp on a path of destruction with unpredictable and uproarious consequences.


FRIDAY 10/23


Panel: Write What You Know @ 1:45pm


A new master class series on writing for specific genres with Paul Feig and Mike White
Moderator: Owen Egerton.

Movie: “American Cowslip” @ 10:15pm

Ethan Inglebrink, an eccentric, agoraphobic heroin addict who is obsessed with his garden, is searching for the perfect moment in a life that is running out of time. And the odds are against him. This darkly comedic tale set in small town California follows the last days of Ethan’s life as he struggles to find love and purpose - at a time when it might be too late to even matter. This colorful film marks the return of AFF alum Mark David.


SATURDAY 10/24


Panel: What Gets Producers Excited @ 2pm


Think you have what it takes to become the next “it” writer? Find out what successful producers are looking for in a script and learn what projects interest them the most. With Garrett Basch, Jeff Graup, Dawn Wolfrom. Moderator: Drew Yanno

Movie: “Tenure” @ 8:15pm

After three years as a professor at Grey College, Charlie Thurber is hoping for tenure. In competition with his colleague, an attractive and seemingly more qualified professor from Yale, he tries a number of tactics that include the founding of an erotic poetry club, showing more school spirit, and the endless pursuit of getting published. Through it all, he finds that his real passion is teaching and that learning is something you’re never too old to do. He also may help his friend catch Bigfoot, they are really, really close this time.


SUNDAY 10/25


Panel: 10/25 The Art of Storytelling with Shane Black @ 1pm


What is it that causes a great script to stand out against all the rest? Why do some scripts seem to pale in comparison to others, even if both capture an interesting story? Three titans of cinema discuss the tools they use to bring a script life with rich characters, authenticity, and memorable dialogue. With Shane Black, Richard Linklater and Tim McCanlies. Moderator: Tom Schatz.

Panel: Turning Your Shorts/Webisodes into a Film Career @ 2:30pm The popularity of short films has exploded thanks to dwindling attention spans, the popularity of Internet sites like YouTube, and the omnipresence of mobile, small screen broadcast outlets like cell phones. How do shorts and features differ in concept and execution? Will the cinema of the future be a hybrid of both? How can you turn your short film into a film career? With Owen Egerton, Michael Fry, Ya’ke Smith and Ben Steinbauer. Moderator: James Macak.

Movie: “The Messenger” at 7 p.m.

The directorial debut of accomplished screenwriter Oren Moverman (I’m Not There and Jesus’ Son) The Messenger is a powerful and tender story about a returned war hero making his first steps toward a normal life. In his first leading role, Foster stars as Will Montgomery, a U.S. Army officer who has just returned home from a tour in Iraq and is assigned to the Army’s Casualty Notification service. Partnered with fellow officer Tony Stone (Harrelson) to deliver tragic news to the loved ones of fallen soldiers, Will faces the challenge of completing his mission while seeking to find comfort and healing back on the home front. When he finds himself drawn to Olivia (Morton), to whom he has just delivered the news of her husband’s death, Will’s emotional detachment begins to dissolve and the film reveals itself as a surprising, humorous, moving and very human portrait of grief, friendship and survival. Not just a well written script, but a showcase for two amazing performances by Foster and Harrelson who bring us into the inner lives of these outwardly steely heroes to reveal their fragility with compassion and dignity.


TUESDAY 10/27


“The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia” @ 10pm


Shoot-outs, robberies, gas-huffing, drug dealing, pill popping, murders, and tap dancing. From MTV Studios and executive producers Johnny Knoxville and Jeff Tremaine (Jackass) comes a shocking and outlandish year-in-the-life documentary about the White Family of Boone County, West Virginia’s most notorious and surly family. Nestled deep in the Appalachian Mountains, the White family lives an existence more like something from the Wild West than modern day suburbified America. The legendary family is as known for their wild, excessive criminal ways as they are for their famous mountain dancing members, including Jesco White, the star of the cult classic documentary Dancing Outlaw. Over the course of one tumultuous year, the Whites deal with a stabbing, criminal sentencing, attempted murder, death and birth. The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia is directed by Julien Nitzberg (producer of Dancing Outlaw).


WEDNESDAY 10/28


Movie: “The Donner Party” @ 7pm


During the winter of 1846, a group of westward bound settlers is stranded in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. They must reach California for salvation, but without food and a guide, the group becomes disillusioned and decisions must be made so that others can stay alive. Inspired by the infamous Donner Party tragedy, the film is a harrowing look at survival and how far some will go to achieve it.


THURSDAY 10/29


Movie: “Up in the Air” @ 8 p.m.


The timely odyssey of Ryan Bingham (Oscar winner George Clooney), a corporate downsizer and consummate modern business traveler who, after years of staying happily airborne, suddenly finds himself ready to make a real connection. Ryan has long been contented with his unencumbered lifestyle lived out across America in airports, hotels and rental cars. He can carry all he needs in one wheel-away case; he’s a pampered, elite member of every travel loyalty program in existence; and he’s close to attaining his lifetime goal of 10 million frequent flier miles - and yet … Ryan has nothing real to hold onto. When he falls for a simpatico fellow traveler (Farmiga), Ryan’s boss (Bateman), inspired by a young, upstart efficiency expert (Kendrick), threatens to permanently call him in from the road. Faced with the prospect, at once terrifying and exhilarating, of being grounded, Ryan begins to contemplate what it might actually mean to have a home.

Possible game-time additions: “Hunger,” “Harmony and Me,” “Cummings Farm” and “The Vicious Kind.” I’ve already seen “Herpes Boy,” so I won’t be seeing it again but recommend it.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: AFF

Austin Makes a Book

austinmakesabook.jpg

What do a student at St. Edward’s University, a guitar-playing singer-songwriter, a screenwriter, a substitute teacher, a 5-year-old boy, and a stay-at-home mom have in common?

They are all contributing to a new project called Austin Makes a Book. Inspired by the efforts of a group in New York City, Phenix and Phenix Literary Publicists are wrangling locals of all stripes to create a book composed by 100 Austinites.

The “crowd-funded” book will include visual, poetic and narrative art, including, but not limited to, drawings, stories and photos from your friends and neighbors that will serve as something of a literary time capsule for our inspiring and inspired city.

In a hyper-literate city crawling with members and would-be members of the creative class, Austin seems a perfect breeding ground for such a project.

The publishers are accepting the first 100 applicants. As a crowd-funded endeavor, each submission costs $30 to assist in paying for the publishing. Any leftover funds will be donated to Room to Read, an organization that works with local communities to support education and literacy around the world in an effort to end poverty.

Submissions can come only from Austin-area residents (the burbs are included) and must be able to fit on a 7”x7” page. To find out more about the project and submit your own work, visit AustinMakesaBook.com. Once the book is published, Phenix will host a party to celebrate the eccentric collaboration.

Image from AustinMakesaBook.com

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: Books

The robots prepare their takeover of sports journalism

robotstyping150.jpg
People always joke about teaching robots to do our jobs, which in turn will make us all obsolete. That’s just crazy black-helicopter-talk, right?

Uh, maybe.

Apparently the geniuses at Northwestern University have created a computer program that can output an actual game story using only statistics and heady computer stuff like algorithms.

The application’s name: Stats Monkey. How cute and fitting, what with the old “a thousand monkeys typing for years could eventually write a Shakespeare play” thing.

According to Stats Monkey:
Imagine that you could push a button, and magically create a story about a baseball game. That’s what the Stats Monkey system does. Given information commonly available online about many games — the box score and the play-by-play — the system automatically generates the text of a story about that game that captures the overall dynamic of the game and highlights the key plays and key players. The story includes an appropriate headline and a photo of the most important player in the game…

“The system is based on two underlying technologies. First, it uses baseball statistical models to figure out what the news is in the story: By analyzing changes in Win Probability and Game Scores, the system can pick out the key plays and players from any baseball game. Second, the system includes a library of narrative arcs that describe the main dynamics of baseball games (as well as many other competitions): Was it a come-from-behind win? Back-and-forth the whole way? Did one team jump out in front at the beginning and then sit on its lead? The system uses a decision tree to select the appropriate narrative arc. This then determines the main components of the game story and enables the system to put them together in a cohesive and compelling manner. The stories can be generated from the point of view of either team.”

The disturbing thing is that the “story” that the computer comes up with is fairly decent. I mean, ol’ Stats Monkey could use some help with segues and such, but it’s not horrible.

To demonstrate it powers, the programmers used a recent game from the Angels and Red Sox ALDS. Here is what it spit out:


BOSTON — Things looked bleak for the Angels when they trailed by two runs in the ninth inning, but Los Angeles recovered thanks to a key single from Vladimir Guerrero to pull out a 7-6 victory over the Boston Red Sox at Fenway Park on Sunday.

Guerrero drove in two Angels runners. He went 2-4 at the plate.

“When it comes down to honoring Nick Adenhart, and what happened in April in Anaheim, yes, it probably was the biggest hit (of my career),” Guerrero said. “Because I’m dedicating that to a former teammate, a guy that passed away.”

Guerrero has been good at the plate all season, especially in day games. During day games Guerrero has a .794 OPS. He has hit five home runs and driven in 13 runners in 26 games in day games.

After Chone Figgins walked, Bobby Abreu doubled and Torii Hunter was intentionally walked, the Angels were leading by one when Guerrero came to the plate against Jonathan Papelbon with two outs and the bases loaded in the ninth inning. He singled scoring Abreu from second and Figgins from third, which gave Angels the lead for good.

The Angels clinched the AL Division Series 3-0.

Angels starter Scott Kazmir struggled, allowing five runs in six innings, but the bullpen allowed only one runs and the offense banged out 11 hits to pick up the slack and secure the victory for the Angels.

J.D. Drew drove in two Red Sox runners. He went 1-4 at the plate.

Drew homered in the fourth inning scoring Mike Lowell.

“That felt like a big swing at the time,” said Drew. “I stayed inside the ball and put a good swing on it. I was definitely going to be ready to battle again tomorrow, but it didn’t work out.”

Drew has been excellent at the plate all season, especially in day games. During day games Drew has a .914 OPS. He has hit five home runs and driven in 17 runners in 36 games in day games.

Papelbon blew the game for Boston with a blown save. Papelbon allowed three runs on four hits in one inning.

Reliever Darren Oliver got the win for Los Angeles. He allowed no runs over one-third of an inning. The Los Angeles lefty struck out none, walked none and surrendered no hits.

Los Angeles closer Brian Fuentes got the final three outs to record the save.

Juan Rivera and Kendry Morales helped lead the Angels. They combined for three hits, three RBIs and one run scored.

Four relief pitchers finished off the game for Los Angeles. Jason Bulger faced four batters in relief out of the bullpen, while Kevin Jepsen managed to record two outs to aid the victory.

I wonder if the robots are as menacing around a buffet table as sports reporters. I kid, I kid. Just channeling my inner Rick Reilly.

Good thing computers can’t conjure sarcasm or I may really be in trouble. Ok.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: Misc.

Balloon Boy barfs on live TV

Look (said in Fred Armisen’s Barack Obama voice), I haven’t paid much attention to this 6-year-old kid Falcon Heene and his flying saucer-building dad. From the second I heard the story yesterday about the family that not once but twice appeared on the surreality TV show “Wife Swap,” I figured he was likely hiding or the mad scientist dad was just trying to get some attention for his gadget. It was just a little too “Truman Show” to be real.

Turns out, Falcon was hiding after dad had yelled at him, and now the news channels have something to yap about for 48 hours.

Great. Count me out.

However, there is one thing that can draw me in at least for a minute. (Seriously, at this point they are begging me to watch.) The family appeared on “Today” this morning, with dad looking like he’s spent a few too many hours in the Saxon Pub. But dad wasn’t the one with the queasy stomach. At about the six-minute mark of the video, young Falcon vomits, right after calmly asking his mother for a cup. And the interview just keeps rolling along. Between two “Wife Swap” appearances and being exploited on TV after being shamed by his father, I think young Falcon may end up a tad scarred. In terms of famous child “actors,” I’m thinking Falcon will end up a little more Corey Haim than Ron Howard.

Weird.

Permalink | Comments (3) | Post your comment Categories: Television

Review: ‘A Serious Man’

In many of their previous movies, Joel and Ethan Coen have subjected their protagonists to all manner of inanity and danger. At times these characters fall victim to their own faulty decisions, while at others they are battered by the uncontrollable forces swirling around them.

But never has a Coen brothers character suffered so greatly with so little in the way of response as Larry Gopnik (Tony-nominated actor Michael Stuhlbarg ) in “A Serious Man.” This fact could possibly be the impetus behind their tongue-in-cheek line in the credits that “no Jews were harmed in the making of this film.” That and the fact that many of the Jewish characters here are drawn as broad caricatures. But, then again, rarely are the Coens’ characters not.

Adhering to the quoted words of 11th-century French biblical scholar Rashi at the beginning of the movie, Gopnik attempts to “receive with simplicity everything that happens” to him. But even Job could only suffer so much before questioning God.

In 1967, far from the joy and liberation of the Summer of Love’s epicenter, trapped in a geometrically rigid Midwestern neighborhood, one seemingly reminiscent of the Coens’ childhood in the suburbs of Minneapolis, Gopnik is trying to live a dutiful life as a college math professor and married father of two, but he is constantly besieged by matters both trivial and serious that have left him in an existential funk.

After trying to explain the theory of Schrodinger’s Cat to his class, an apt metaphor for the ambiguity that surrounds Gopnik’s search for spiritual answers, the resigned professor admits to a student who has failed a recent exam that “the stories I give you in class are fables — even I don’t understand the dead cat.”

That which confounds Gopnik does not end with the cat. At home, his wife says that she wants a divorce, not because of anything that her meek husband has done, but simply because she has fallen in love with someone else, the pompous and absurd Sy Ableman (a pitch-perfect Fred Melamed).

Gopnik’s children, meanwhile, are doing nothing to make matters better. His young son, Danny (Aaron Wolff), in a haze of marijuana, TV addiction and Jefferson Airplane, is dragging his feet along the path to his bar mitzvah. His teenage daughter, Sarah (Jessica McManus), is consumed with vanity and the desire for a nose job, which she attempts to expedite by stealing money from her father.

To heighten the domestic aggravations, the Gopniks have been saddled with Larry’s brother Arthur (Richard Kind), who is sleeping on the couch, at least when he is not furtively and frantically working on his probability chart of the universe or hogging the bathroom to drain his sebaceous cyst. Yes, the uncle with a cyst on his neck is actually a pain in the family’s neck. Sometimes the Coens just can’t help but be cheeky.

Trapped in his familial nightmare by a hostile goy neighbor on one side and the sultry temptations of a beautiful neighbor on the other, a sin to which he will not let himself fall prey, Gopnik feels the world closing in on him. And when his wife suggests that he move with his brother to the Jolly Roger motel (more ironic winking), Gopnik hardly raises his voice in protest.

At work, things are no less treacherous. The aforementioned failing student attempts to bribe Gopnik for a passing grade.

Gopnik also discovers that an anonymous letter writer has been lobbying against his receiving tenure due to his alleged “moral turpitude.” And his office phone will not stop ringing with calls from a man at the Columbia Record Club, asking about late payments on Santana’s “Abraxas.”

Oy vey.

Confused and scared, Gopnik turns to his local rabbis for answers, but their tepid offers of assistance consist of obtuse riddles, much like the ancient (and made-up) Yiddish riddle with which the Coens begin their film, and empty rhetoric about Gopnik’s need to change his perspective.

Gopnik, who has made a living working in theorems and proofs, cannot accept that God might perpetually vex us with questions without providing answers. And there is no equation by which moral correctness plus humility equals peace or any other reward, no matter how serious a man one might be.

Despite being manipulated and deceived, Gopnik, betraying a mix of Jason Bateman and Woody Allen trapped in Joaquin Phoenix’s body, can only muster raised eyebrows and a pursed mouth in response to his many injustices. You want to grab the pitiful Gopnik by his shoulders and shake him into action.

The Coens’ script and the eye of longtime collaborator, cinematographer Roger Deakins, paint a surrealistically vivid world stuffed with symbolism and myriad spiritual dilemmas, where suffering is elevated to art.

But the overwrought sadism leaves one feeling not empathy with Gopnik and his universal struggle but disgust.

There is no doubt that the Coens, masters of this cinematic universe, want to see how much torment they can foist on one helpless man. But, after the chuckles die, the question is why?

And just when you think that Gopnik has found some respite from his many ailments, a new storm (or two) is brewing on the horizon. As it always seems to be. Why? That’s just life.

Oy vey, indeed.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: Movies

Being beautiful can be a real pain in the buttocks

guzman150.jpg
Anybody who knows me knows one thing for certain: When I get surgery done on my butt, I always use a licensed medical professional. Like someone who graduated from medical school, or who at least has watched a lot of “House.”

If only Mexican rock star Alejandra Guzman had followed my advice. It seems the Latin Grammy winner had been undergoing buttock injections to make herself “more beautiful” (when is enough enough?) for her new boyfriend, but something went wrong on her way to badonkadonk bliss.

From the AP:

Guzman spoke Wednesday with Televisa, a day after authorities arrested the director based on other clients’ claims that they suffered complications. Prosecutors told Reforma newspaper the director had no cosmetology degrees, only a high school diploma.

To her credit, Guzman has brought attention to the mishap and hopes to inform people about the dangers of cosmetic surgery. But maybe the 41 year-old should have just been OK with growing old naturally. Buttocks injections? Really?

Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment

Is El Chilito in a cursed location?

chilito250.jpg
Everybody knows that one of the best marketing tools of any business is often the three Ls: location, location, location.

Where your business is can help drive business and be a determining factor in success, and it can also be a detriment. We all know the spots on certain streets in towns where we have lived that always seemed cursed. A restaurant or shop is there one day and gone the next.

That has been the unfortunate truth for several restaurants at 1025 Barton Springs Road, at the intersection with Dawson Road.

While the west end of Barton Springs Road may be considered Austin’s Restaurant Row, the stretch of road between Sandy’s and McDonald’s has been anything but, especially for the unlucky spots at 1025.

Maybe you remember the sandwich places Castleberry’s Cafe (2003-2005) or Rockhound’s (2006), but it’s doubtful. There is a slightly better chance you remember Gypsy Italian Bistro (2007-2008), an average joint with a limited menu. They’re all gone, of course. Nothing seems to last. But maybe El Chilito will buck the curse that is featured in this CNNMoney.com story about “5 deadly spots.”

I am not sure if it is the fact that there are limited entertainment options within walking distance of the restaurant or the limited parking or relative inexperience of past restaurant operators at the address, but I have always been somewhat surprised that no place has ever succeeded there. Given people’s brand awareness of El Chilito thanks to El Chile and the original El Chilito on Manor Road, I think if any place is going to make it, this is the one.

From the CNNMoney.com story:


Legend has it that in the 1980s, 1025 Barton Springs Road was a hippie commune, with tents and pods stretched along the cliffs behind the property.

“Wacky. That’s Austin,” laughs Carlos Rivero, a six-year veteran of Austin’s restaurant scene. In August, Rivero became the fourth entrepreneur in five years to open a restaurant at the address, which has also been home to an architecture firm and a beer garden.

“I’ve wanted to go into that neighborhood for some time,” says Rivero. “Barton Springs Road is a landmark address.”

Rivero chalks the high failure rate of 1025 up to the inexperience of its recent tenants — newbie restaurateurs looking to capitalize on the neighborhood’s high traffic volume. As the hosting grounds for events such as the Austin City Limits Music Festival, the locale is also home to Zilker Park, a 350-acre area popular for its swimming pool and botanical gardens.

Gypsy Italian Bistro, the address’ latest casualty, received lots of good press for its innovative cuisine but was a little too fancy for the area, says Rivero. Gypsy’s chef, a recent graduate of Le Cordon Bleu, “was a first-time operator with very limited experience in the restaurant business — as a sit-down, full-service Italian restaurant, the place wasn’t very well capitalized for this particular location,” he says.

Permalink | Comments (7) | Post your comment Categories: Food

Wilco in Willco: Worth the drive

If you were one of those folks who decided that the combination of post-ACL live music fatigue and the 22-mile drive to “the sticks” out in Cedar Park was not worth making it out to Wilco at the Cedar Park Center, you made a mistake.

I had heard horror stories about parking after the George Strait show, but with the center’s Web site directing people to U-turn down U.S. 183 and enter from that side, there was no wait at all. Of course, there was a $10 cash parking fee, but that is to be expected, I guess, at a lot of arenas. The will call line was another story. It twisted its way through the center’s foyer and stretched out into the night. It looked to be about a 45-minute line, which I eventually was able to avoid, thanks to a friend. (Thank you, Emily.) I hear there was a $5 charge per ticket to print them online, so I guess it could be considered a line-avoidance fee, but I would probably do whatever I could to avoid will call in the future. Then again, I am not sure the venue will ever host another concert I want to attend.

Since I know some of you will want to know, there were beer sales on the concourse, 16 oz. Miller Lite and the like for $8 and 12 oz. white Belgians for $7, with liquor served on the outdoor patios. And to add to the surreal factor, vendors walked the aisles selling bottled beer during the show … just like at a game. Yes, weird.

Inside, it was, well, a minor league hockey arena. Picture any arena where you have seen basketball or hockey — think American Airlines Arena in Dallas or the Toyota Center in Houston — and subtract the glitzy TVs and overwrought food courts and divide by two. It was certainly strange to see a band I have seen a dozen times in smaller venues take the stage at the end of an arena.

The back end of the arena was partitioned off, due to ticket sales falling short of capacity, leaving a somewhat intimate space, at least for an arena. The seats, on other hand, were way more than intimate. While my fold-up chairs in the first couple of rows by “the boards” offered a little space, friends in the rows behind me said their leg room was virtually non-existent. It was so bad, they even took pictures and insist it is a massive design flaw. So, you’ve been warned.

I won’t get bogged down in the details of the show, as my colleague Peter Mongillo is writing our official review, but I will give a few thoughts.

It took the band and the crowd a few songs to warm up to the setting … it’s just weird to see Wilco in an arena. But by the time the guys had finished a searing rendition of “Bull Black Nova,” off their new album, everyone seemed on board. And by the time guitar virtuoso Nels Cline finished taking us through his gorgeous and blistering guitar solos on “Impossible Germany,” it felt like old times.

The show, due to its setting, had a weird but cool vibe, almost like Wilco had stolen the keys to some hockey arena in the middle of nowhere and emailed their friends to come check them out. It felt like our little secret. I was worried the band would be off-put by the venue or the fact that the place was not sold out, a fact concealed by the curtain at the end of the arena. But they warmed to the challenge and even gave ironic nods to the circumstances.

At one point, Jeff Tweedy addressed the crowd, as he did often throughout the show, and dryly said, “Just hangin’ out, playing some music in a hockey arena.” And went on to say, after “Deeper Down,” that we shouldn’t be surprised to hear existential rock in an arena, because, really, “Isn’t all arena rock existential?” Tweedy’s sarcastic and innocent pokes at the surreal setting called out the elephant in the room (that was the room) and got everyone to enjoy a laugh.

Some may say that Tweedy chatted too much — at one point he re-gifted a Nolan Ryan autographed baseball to a fan for his birthday — but it all felt natural to me. I think just before “Sky Blue Sky” came out, and for the subsequent tour, it felt like we as fans were still getting used to a “new” Wilco, not only in their lyrics but also in their general demeanor, at least Jeff’s. The band seemed a little less dark and dangerous, and I think some fans were not comfortable with the band’s, well, comfort with their lives. On Thursday night, for the first time in a while, I felt everyone was on the same page. The band was as tight as its ever been (the rhythm section destroyed and the band broke into some rather funky — for them — jams), and there seemed to be a shared joy and camaraderie with band and audience, born out of mutual gratitude not suffering or ennui. The crowd seemed just as into the songs off of the last two albums as they were the earlier stuff. And at one point Cline and Pat Sansone traded solo licks, with Sansone even going all Spinal Tap on us as he preened and leaned against an amp with his axe thrust toward the crowd.

I have heard from some that the sound at the center was a little muddied, but I didn’t really pick up on that too much from where I was sitting. I can say that it was the loudest Wilco show I have ever heard, and one of the most enjoyable.

Tweedy lamented at one point that he really loved being in Austin and preferred two-night runs (at Stubb’s, I would imagine), but was happy to be there nonetheless. From the response of the crowd who made the trek out to the burbs, including Jim Eno of Spoon and Marty Maguire and Emily Robison of the Dixie Chicks, the feeling was mutual.

Wilco at Cedar Park Center (10.08.09)
“Wico (The Song)”
“Shot in the Arm”
“Bull Black Nova”
“You Are My Face”
“I Am Trying to Break Your Heart”
“One Wing”
“At Least That’s What You Said”
“One by One”
“I’ll Fight”
“Impossible Germany”
“Deeper Down”
“Handshake Drugs”
“I Can’t Stand It”
“Jesus, Etc.” (as sing-along)
“I Hate it Here”
“Theologians”
“I’m the Man Who Loves You”
First Encore
“Via Chicago”
“You Never Know”
“California Stars” (with Liam Finn)
“Late Greats”
“Heavy Metal Drummer”
Second Encore
“Walken”
“King Pin”
“Monday”
“Outtasite” (Outta Mind)”
“Hoodoo Voodoo”

Permalink | Comments (4) | Post your comment Categories: Music

 
Advertisement
Out & About

Out & About

L Style G Style 2cd Anniversary Party at Mercury Hall

In Houston during the 1970s, one could break down the gay social ...

Advertisement