Austin360 blogs > Digital Savant > Archives > 2008 > December > 18 > Entry
What Not To Tweet (or, Twitter-Me-Nots)
I will admit it: after nearly two years of using Twitter, I’ve gotten a bit set in my ways. I have all kinds of unwritten rules in my head for why I do or don’t follow specific people. That’s because I’ve tried very hard to keep the list of people I follow small, as I explained in my post on how I use Twitter.
Despite the number of people I follow growing past 350, I still try to read every Twitter post from every person I follow, even if that means skimming through 20 or 30 pages of overnight posts every morning. It’s doable. People don’t all post at the same time. In fact, a lot of people I follow rarely post at all.
I can imagine the day will soon some when I can’t continue to read everything. It’s happened a few times. But so far I’ve been able to keep it under control by making snap judgments about whether to follow back people who add me to their list and when to cut the cord on someone whose posts have annoyed me or no longer seem worth reading.
It’s harsh. I never feel good about it. But it’s necessary. For me, at least.
So, what determines whether I unfollow someone (or choose not to follow them when I glance at their profile page, which I do for every person who adds me)? Here’s the list of things people do on Twitter that annoy me. They don’t all warrant an unfollow (and I’m guilty of committing some of them myself), but it’s the things that keep coming up that weigh into my decision to drop someone. It’s followed by a list of things Twitter friends sent in that annoy them as well. There’s definitely some overlap.
Things people do that annoy me on Twitter
- The biggest is rapid-fire posting to no particular end. Tech blogger Robert Scoble used to be the worst perpetrator this, but he’s calmed down quite a bit. He still does it on occasion, usually late at night when he’s traveling abroad, but his blue moon news scoops make up for it to me, so I’ve kept him in my Following list.
- Twitter accounts that are just RSS feeds or links to blog posts. I don’t ever bother to follow those accounts in the first place. My only exception is Amazon’s list of daily MP3 deals.
- “Please nominate me for (Internet award nobody’s heard of!” I’m skeptical of Web awards to begin with, but I will be blunt: If you truly deserve to be nominated for a particular award, someone will nominate you without your having to ask.
- Constant, overly sexual posts. Hey, I’ve dropped a double-entendre or three (a triple-entendre?) but constant smutty pillow talk gets tiring on Twitter. It just makes you sound like you’re starved for attention. Take it to LiveJournal or MySpace.
- Multiple pimpin’ tweets asking people to check out the same blog post. At some point, wily marketers convinced some bloggers that since not everyone is on Twitter at the same time, it’s OK to mention the same content over and over so nobody misses it. That’s exactly what a marketer would think. One tweet per blog post unless the blog post itself has new information or something significant has been updated.
- I won’t follow people who have these words in their bios: “SEO,” “maven,” “imagineer, “dating,” “sales,” “Web 2.0.”
- Those who try to make me feel guilty for not following them or for unfollowing. Trust me, I have my reasons.
- On that note, complaining that you can’t direct message someone because they’re not following you. Yeah, we know that trick. That’s why we have e-mail.
- Getting @replies is great, but not when people ask questions that the most basic Google search would easily answer. (“What does ‘ftw’ mean?”)
- Welcoming every new follower you get. If I see a post like this: “Welcome, @john, @steve, @tracy, @wholefoods, etc…” I will generally unfollow. Oddly, the people who do this the most are the ones with so many followers that they have to post four or five of these shout-outs a day. Annnoying. Stop.
- Retweeting without attribution. I’ve unfollowed people for repeating something I just posted when they didn’t say where they got the info. It’s just good manners.
- Posting a continuous stream of @replies to the same person, especially when it’s something that should be discussed over private messages. That will usually cause me to unfollow one or both of the conversationalists just to break the stream.
- When someone posts a stream of posts from a conference, trying to quote what people on a panel are saying. Usually, the information is out of context and way too obvious to be very useful: “Panelist says the Internet is changing the way we all work. #techbore.” I’ve done this myself and I am ashamed.
- The dreaded Brightkite auto-post. I don’t really care that you just arrived in Austin from wherever you were driving that day. And, also, nobody uses Brightkite anymore.
- Ignorant, racist posts. This should go without saying, but I was amazed when someone I followed posted something so ridiculously stupid and racist that I wanted to not only not-follow them, but block them as well. They ended up unfollowing me a few days later. I was glad.
- Politically shrill posts. Often, the worst offenders are preaching to the choir. And preaching badly. I unfollowed a lot of people during the presidential debates.
- Private Twitter accounts. Nothing personal. I just can’t read anything to determine whether I should try to follow or not if I don’t already know you. I usually just move on.
- Twitter accounts with no bio information or link to a person’s Web site. I won’t follow someone if I can’t figure out who they are or where they’re from. I try to keep most of the people I follow in the Austin area unless I already know them.
- Sucking up to popular Twitter personalities in the hopes they’ll reply or follow back.
- Those who follow large numbers of people then unfollow everyone who doesn’t follow back right away. We know what you’re doing. It ain’t classy.
Yes, it’s quite a cranky list. I am quite the curmudgeon, I know.
Here is a list of similar complaints from others on Twitter:
- I get cranky with epic-length entries that spill over into three or more posts! You have to read upwards, piecing them together, and often they’re interrupted by someone else’s tweet. It completely defeats the purpose of Twitter.
- People who tweet (is that the word?) about 5 times in a row, like, all the time (especially if I don’t know them). These tweeters complete monopolize my feed and that’s just bad.
- The last couple of folks I unfollowed were because they were tweeting holier-than-thou “shame on you for not thinking/voting/believing the way I do” kinds of messages. I love twitter for allowing us to converse and all have our own opinions; I don’t have time for someone who doesn’t respect the thoughts and beliefs of the others around them.
- Anyone who makes a discriminatory statement (race, ethnicity, gender, religion) gets dropped like a rock. This has happened a couple of times and I immediately wonder why in the heck I followed those folks in the first place!
- Telling us what they are eating and even linking with a pic. I mean, really?
- Constantly ripping on something I enjoy; being way too damn serious all the time.
- Automatic “thanks for following” dms are my current top Twitter annoyance.
- Ponder their bodily functions, or brag that they are Twittering while on the toilet. I do not need the visual aid.
- My #1 criteria for unfollowing is machine-gun posting: posting piles of tweets in a v. short time, drowning out all other voices.
- I unfollow when people say “Good morning, Tweeps” and “Good night, Tweeps” (or “Tweeples”). It reminds me of the damn Meet Markets @ Television Without Pity.
- I also unfollow when people Tweet 7-8 times in a row and when their Tweets start talking continuously about their personal monetary debt.
- Twitter things that annoy me: advertising (alltop, magpie, or other kinds of repetitive ad tweets). I haven’t unfollowed anyone yet, though.
- When people update every five seconds and have nothing interesting and/or funny to say or just say inside jokes that I don’t get.
- Re: unfolllowing, if a tweeter sends out 17 pages of tweets in less than 12 hours, I unfollow.
- It’s hard to quantify but there is such a thing as too much tweeting. When home page at any given time is 80 percent one person.
- Begging: twitting a blog post, then subsequently tweeting ‘0 comments’ ‘0 comments’ ‘0 comments’. So sad.
- You’ve probably already gotten “carrying on a conversation for more than two tweets with the same person” or something similar.
- Using twitter regularly as an announcement service for posts to your blog, Flickr page, Facebook, Brightkite location change, etc.
- 1.) name drop 2.) post links with no context 3.) talk (brag) about how many followers they have 4.) link to Rickroll
- I’ll unfollow some1 who’s every post is a news “link” or RT. If I wanted news I’d read it.unless it’s a special account like statesman
- How about when peole nominate themselves and ask everyone to nominate them?
- Twitter gripe: When people angrily or sarcastically note whenever they get unfollowed, despite having hundreds of followers.
- Recently unfollowed a fellow author because all her tweets were self-promos, but poorly designed to look like they weren’t.
- Marketing drones trying to pass for genuine people; personal trivia before I’ve decided you’re an interesting person; Magpie; excess volume.
- Twitter peeve: when someone makes up a hash tag and uses it to express an aside insted of a real topic #reallyannoying
- Twitter tick off # 109: links with no explanation. just www.wtf.com/buildingmyhits.html
- I unfollowed Guy Kawasaki cuz I hated all the “alltop” biz tweets. I unfollow those who signed up for his automatic retweeting, too.
- When they say “DM me” but with the implied “if you’re important enough to be followed by me. [Note from Omar: this was in reference to my asking people to DM items for this list. Hey, thanks!]
- Anyone who makes discriminatory statements gets dropped like a rock & makes me wonder why in the heck I followed them in the 1st place!
- Nothing but ads in their tweets. don’t follow back. never @reply back. talk only about themselves.
- Constant twitter with just links in them nothing else, once in a while is okay, but if thats all they tweet then its bye bye.
- Crossposting on Facebook.
Deep breaths. Deep breaths. Got more? Post them in the comments.
(And a special note of thanks to everyone who contributed to that second list.)
Permalink | Comments (24) | Post your comment Categories: Internet




Comments
Click here to report comment abuse.
By kcurrier
February 1, 2009 6:16 PM | Link to this
Add these words to jargony mean-nothing phrases people use to describe their so-called expertise: Rainmaker or (insert industry here) evangelist. Ick ick ick!!!
By John E.
December 24, 2008 12:52 PM | Link to this
It all depends on how you use twitter... I use it to find links to resources or blogs that inspire, amuse, or help me. Not for the twittering in and of itself. Not at all interested in the popularity thing.
By Debra Snider
December 22, 2008 6:58 PM | Link to this
I'm relatively new to Twitter - originally found it annoying, then learned to follow people who post interesting content, listen and reply as well as speak, and appear interested in genuine interactivity. What a difference! I love Twitter now and only wish I'd had your list sooner. Thank you very much for it.
By rsomers
December 20, 2008 8:11 PM | Link to this
Omar, you're nearly as cranky as I am! But I love the list.
In addition to "maven" and "imagineer", I avoid following "wealth coaches." However, first I dm them and ask to borrow $100. I figure if they're wealthy, they won't mind. So far none have taken me up on it.
By James ODonnell
December 20, 2008 1:14 PM | Link to this
Your article here about twitter happened to coincide with my registration there. I found your guidelines amusing, informative, and they made a lot of sense to me. I admit I was tempted to see if I could violate every one of your guidelines to become the perfect twitter jerk.
By iphigenie
December 20, 2008 4:30 AM | Link to this
On the direct message thing - I have had people whom I started to follow send me a DM question (of the "hi, thanks for the follow, what made you follow?") but obviously since they dont follow me back I cant answer. I just reply in public, when that happens, then unfollow - because it is plain rude to do it.
By Omar Gallaga
December 19, 2008 11:52 PM | Link to this
Joshua -- I was half-joking about "maven," but the real danger is when that word is paired with one of the other forbidden ones: "SEO maven," "dating maven" and "Web 2.0 maven" are clearly jargony, mean-nothing signifiers, don't you think?
It's just one of those words that is quickly coming to mean nothing more than, "I believe that I am expert."
A lot of "mavens" aren't.
By Joshua Kaufman
December 19, 2008 10:40 PM | Link to this
I have the word "maven" in my bio, and I hope you never follow me. I wouldn't want someone with such a black and white view of Twitter reading my tweets.
By jamie
December 19, 2008 9:44 PM | Link to this
Bad new tweet to reply tweet ratio. I like to see both (i.e. don't want to change settings so I only see non-replies), but some people just reply too much.
By Omar Gallaga
December 19, 2008 2:17 PM | Link to this
You see right through me, Genia. You must be one of those mavens.
By Genia
December 19, 2008 1:34 PM | Link to this
I agree with most of what's written here, but to all n00bs (newbies?) don't seriously consider this THE etiquette book for Twitter. What irritates some people, may actually amuse and entertain other people.
And also, I caution people to be leery of those posin' as Twitter know-it-alls offering you great Twitter advice. They're writing Twitter posts because those Twitter posts drive serious traffic to their blogs. Right, Omar!?
By @VerySuperCool
December 19, 2008 11:39 AM | Link to this
Wow, you really are a curmudgeon! But I love your honesty and detailed descriptions.
The one that bugs me the most is when there is no profile, no info at all on their twitter page. What's the point then?
I've committed a few twitter sins myself just this week. I'm still learning the ropes I guess. Thanks again for sharing your cranky list with everyone!
By @ggroovin
December 19, 2008 10:44 AM | Link to this
Hola, @omarg.
Wow! Quite the list. Think I'm gonna have to nick-name you @amargo (the word for bitter in Spanish). hehe Seriously, though, great list.
I guess my personal #1 peeve is live-tweeting of sporting or other events. If I were interested in "Touchdown!!!" I'd probably be watching the game.
A single tweet letting me know you're happy or sad about the outcome of the game I don't mind, but often sports fans among us will essentially live-tweet every significant change in the game or event. (In fact, the Mumbai attacks were a terrible occurrence, but some folks I follow dropped everything to post dozens of #mumbai tweets per hour when they don't even have family in Mumbai.)
Basic rule of Twitter for me is basic rule of marketing: remember and respect your audience.
BTW- I am guilty of welcoming new followers. I do it because I have a rather strict policy with myself to follow only around 100 people, but I want to give a shout out to legit folks (not spammers) who connect to me. I do generally try to do these welcome messages late in the evening so fewer of my followers are put off by these messages. Then again, I don't get dozens of followers a day, unlike you, my friend. ;D
Down with live tweeting! Long live @amargo!
By Lavanna Martin
December 18, 2008 6:56 PM | Link to this
Hi, Omar.
I am so glad that I saw the link to this article on Twitter. I'm a n00b, and it is really good to have an "etiquette book". I felt ashamed that I had "followed" some heavy-hitters today, just so I would fee like I at least knew the in-crowd. After reading your article, I went over and removed them. I feel so much better about myself. Thank you for keeping me an honest.
Thank you,
Lavanna Martin
By The Harriman Team
December 18, 2008 6:54 PM | Link to this
Wow, that's some list! Maybe, for brevity's sake, you should have written about who you WOULD follow! Just kidding! I agree with most, a few not so much. I was going to get into some examples, but for brevity's sake, I'll just say that you missed 2 of my current pet peeves: the MLM tweet, and (I'll get unfollowed for this, I'm sure!) the blip.fm tweet. I'll unfollow a MLMer, but usually not a "blipper". I prefer to listen to my own music via last.fm or pandora, not someone else's, but I'll let them slide becuz usually the rest of their tweets are content-rich. Lastly, I have to say I've never received any overtly sexual tweets in my entire time on Twitter. Now that IS sad! Thanks for a great post and for giving us something to think about!
By Omar Gallaga
December 18, 2008 6:28 PM | Link to this
Losaltohomes -- As I said in the post, I've committed many of these tweets myself.
As to things I DO like, I gotcha covered -- my post on how I use Twitter and an "I'm on Twitter -- now what?" guide.
I'm not ALWAYS this much of a jerk!
By losaltoshomes
December 18, 2008 6:21 PM | Link to this
Maybe it would be better for you to post on the "tweets" that don't annoy you. It might be a smaller list.
I think almost everyone has, whether intentionally or not, shot of a tweet that they probably shouldn't have. It is part of the Twitter learning process.
By Tracy Viselli
December 18, 2008 5:57 PM | Link to this
You left "guru" and "evangelist" off your list of words not to put on your profile.
By Julie Gomoll
December 18, 2008 5:30 PM | Link to this
I really hate bragging/record-keeping - I have X followers. Likewise, asking people to follow @lamer so they reach some threshold only shows your/their lack of interested in making actual connections.
I also don't care what anyone's grade or rank is or what a-list you're on. If these grades are that meaningful to you, you deserve your low self esteem.
By Jeff Beckham
December 18, 2008 4:25 PM | Link to this
That's a solid list. Interesting how rapid-fire posting is at the top of everyone's list. About the only ones I'd put up a counter-argument for is the cross-posting on Facebook (which you talked about below) and the SEO mention. There's both good and bad in the SEO world, but unfortunately, it's the shady and self-promotional of the lot that get the most attention.
By @Tracy
December 18, 2008 3:43 PM | Link to this
I forgot a couple, mostly to do with insecure self-promotion:
Favorite-whoring: people who either outright discuss their count at Favrd.com (a website that tracks how many people have given "gold stars" to your tweets), or outright ask for more gold stars.
Status-whoring: people who make a fuss over their rank on TwitterGrader.com (a website that claims to track Twitter status by measuring who someone is connected to on Twitter)
By Omar Gallaga
December 18, 2008 3:42 PM | Link to this
I cross-post to Facebook for the same reason. Most of my Facebook friends aren't on Twitter and they regularly comment on those items on FB. I can see how it can get tiresome for someone who follows you on both,though.
By Bo Nash
December 18, 2008 3:27 PM | Link to this
I agree the flood of SEO people started to get obnoxious, and for me, that was followed by all of the "multi-level marketing" get rich quick schemes. Then again, are those crowds really all that different?
By @tronovision
December 18, 2008 3:26 PM | Link to this
While I agree at times the crossposting on Facebook can be annoying, there are many people who don't use Twitter who are my "friends". I have an exhaustive list of people who are trying to generically ask "what I have been up too?" in life and work. I feel that by using the Facebook twitter app, I have successfully answered these questions, while freeing my inbox and "wall" of generic inquires. Both parties involved are ultimately satisfied and I believe that is what's most important.